Rekap vs. Google Gemini

Google Gemini is great at research, summarization, and helping you get answers from the web and your Google Workspace. But it operates more like a turbocharged search engine than a system that understands your organization’s inner workings.

Rekap is workflow-native. It lives inside your actual meetings, conversations, and systems — mapping how people work together and surfacing what’s needed to move faster and stay aligned.

Gemini helps you search. Rekap helps you operate.

Gemini is deeply integrated with Google Docs, Sheets, and Gmail. That’s powerful for knowledge workers — but it’s still limited to documents and email threads.

Rekap goes further. It understands how your organization functions across teams and tools, capturing conversations, identifying gaps, and driving follow-up — automatically.

Gemini integrates with files. Rekap integrates with how you work.

Gemini is prompt-based: you tell it what to do, and it responds. But it doesn't watch how decisions evolve or how dynamics shift across teams unless you manually feed it that info.

Rekap listens in real time. It learns who’s involved, what’s discussed, and what’s unresolved — and it keeps track, without needing to be told.

Gemini waits for prompts. Rekap anticipates the moment.

Gemini provides great answers in the moment. But every time you return, you start fresh unless you bring the full context.

Rekap builds persistent organizational memory. It remembers what was said, by whom, and in what context — enabling continuity and better decision-making across time.

Gemini delivers answers. Rekap delivers continuity.

Gemini is a fantastic assistant for individual productivity. But it doesn’t drive cross-functional follow-through, reveal systemic friction, or help leaders see what’s working and what’s not.

Rekap acts like an intelligent operator — one that helps you spot misalignment, resolve blockers, and reinforce the rhythms that keep your company running.

Gemini helps individuals. Rekap moves teams.